Val Farrell's Blog
6.04.2012
"What is truth?" said Pilate
The following article is taken from the New York Times (June 3) It would appear to give the fullest, most rounded and balanced account of the rumours we keep hearing about the Pope's butler revealing secrets to a journalist. Even so it really only takes the whole story just a little bit further. Following the NYT piece there is a piece from the Catholic Herald which you may think gives a better balance to everything.
- Depending on your view on these things you may think this blog should not be repeating it.
- On the other hand, you may believe that as a member of the Church, you have a right and a duty to be as fully informed as possible and in that way help to keep the "running" of the Church as healthy as possible.
Please choose whether you want to read this or not, and if you think we should not be broadcasting the story, please tell us by email.
VF
VATICAN CITY — In an undisclosed location here, the Vatican authorities are busy questioning Paolo Gabriele, the pope’s butler, and others in a widening leaks scandal that has made the seat of the Roman Catholic Church appear to be a hornet’s nest of back-stabbing and gossip.
Paolo Gabriele
Across town, in the lobby of a fancy hotel on the Via Veneto, Gianluigi Nuzzi, the investigative reporter whose new book based on some of the leaks has sent the Vatican into a tailspin, was holding court and looking rather pleased.
“I’m serene, I’m tranquil, convinced that I did my work in a correct way, without raising questions about the Holy Father,” Mr. Nuzzi said in an interview last week, during which he was twice interrupted by fans asking him to sign copies of his book, “Your Holiness: The Secret Papers of Benedict XVI.”
With its glimpses of behind-the-scenes spats in the Apostolic Palace, where the pope lives, and high-stakes power struggles over the secretive — and lucrative — Vatican bank, the book has set Italy abuzz even during a week dominated by a deadly earthquake, dismal economic forecasts and a soccer match-fixing investigation that has shaken Italians’ faith in an institution almost as beloved as the papacy.
The product of multiple, interlocking controversies, “VatiLeaks” looks poised to become one of the most destructive, if one of the most hermetic, crises of Benedict’s troubled papacy.
Vatican experts say that Mr. Gabriele is most likely to be a fall guy, or at least a lower-level figure, in a scandal with at least three shadowy Vatican machinations that are revealed in the leaks: a campaign to undermine the Vatican secretary of state, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone; controversy over the management of the Vatican bank; and intense infighting between Italian cardinals vying for position in the Conclave that will one day elect Benedict’s successor.
Above all, “VatiLeaks” has once again revealed how the Vatican is not only a global force with one billion faithful worldwide, but also a deeply Italian institution where connections and loyalty often count more than merit and Machiavellian power plays are the rule more than the exception.
“This isn’t Watergate. This isn’t ‘Vaticangate.’ This is a small game of power plays in which the ecclesiastical right wants to put the Ratzinger papacy in crisis,” said Alberto Melloni, the director of the John XXIII Center in Bologna, a liberal Catholic research institute, referring to Benedict, the former Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger.
The battle lines are complex, but in Mr. Melloni’s view, the cardinals who want to undermine Cardinal Bertone and, by implication, the pope come from more traditionalist branches of the church. Others see the infighting as more about influence and money — in which powerful conservative Catholic groups like Opus Dei and Communion and Liberation may play a role — than about any larger ideology.
Critics inside and outside the church say that Cardinal Bertone, 77, has been a weak chief executive to a theologian pope with little interest in governing, and some of the documents seem to bear this out. In one, Cardinal Carlo Maria Viganò, formerly the second-in-command at the organization that administers Vatican City State, complained of corruption and cronyism in the awarding of construction contracts and alleged that Cardinal Bertone had been influenced by outsiders in Italian political circles.
Other documents provide a window into power clashes over the Vatican bank’s troubled efforts to meet international transparency standards. In one letter that appeared this year, Cardinal Attilio Nicora, the head of an internal financial watchdog that the Vatican created in 2010, said that the Vatican bank had refused to provide details on suspicious bank activities before an anti-money-laundering law went into effect in 2011.
Mr. Nuzzi’s book also includes letters by Ettore Gotti Tedeschi, the Vatican bank president from 2009 until he was ousted by the board of directors on May 24, a day before Mr. Gabriele’s arrest was announced. Mr. Gotti Tedeschi has said in interviews that some in the Vatican were blocking his efforts to make the bank more transparent. Other Italian news media reports have suggested that Mr. Gotti Tedeschi, said to be a member of Opus Dei, was acting to protect that group’s financial interests.
Who exactly is behind the leaks is the subject of perhaps the most intense speculation. In Corriere della Sera, a well-respected judicial reporter, Fiorenza Sarzanini, wrote that Mr. Gabriele’s appointment to the papal household in 2006 had been sponsored by Cardinal Leonardo Sandri, the prefect of the Vatican’s Congregation for Eastern Churches and an Argentine with a power base inside the Vatican hierarchy. She noted that Mr. Gabriele was a member of Communion and Liberation, hinting that its interests may also be in play.
In a front-page editorial in La Repubblica on Friday, the editor in chief, Ezio Mauro, said the leaks were part of an orchestrated campaign by unnamed forces within the Vatican aimed at undermining Cardinal Bertone, so that they could have more influence in a future conclave to elect a new pope. “It is an operation both primitive and extremely modern in its elementary violence, made of ink and paper in the Internet era,” Mr. Mauro wrote.
The scandal has caused the Vatican to shift once again into crisis-management mode. The Vatican spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, held daily news briefings last week to deny press reports, including Ms. Sarzanini’s as well as several that reported a meeting between Cardinal Bertone and an Italian industrialist to discuss the Vatican’s buying an Italian bank so that it could meet international transparency norms without changing the secretive Vatican bank.
Father Lombardi has also discussed the state of the investigation into “Paolo,” as he familiarly refers to Mr. Gabriele, who was a trusted member of the papal household before his arrest last week by Vatican gendarmes on allegations of aggravated theft.
Mr. Gabriele, 46, who has not yet been formally charged, is so far the only person arrested in the leaks scandal, but Father Lombardi said others were being questioned. He did not say whether any were cardinals. He said the scandal had painted an “exaggeratedly negative” picture of the Vatican, which “doesn’t correspond to reality.”
In the book, Mr. Nuzzi calls his main source only “Maria,” but he conceded that the book was the product of “lots of sources.” As he sat in the hotel lobby, nattily dressed in a crisp blue suit with lavender pinstripes, the author refused to discuss Mr. Gabriele. “I hold sources sacred. If it’s not him, I can’t say anything. If it is, I can’t,” he said.
But he could not resist considering some hypotheses. “If it was him, why? He’s a Catholic, a Christian, a believer, one of the people closest to the pope,” Mr. Nuzzi said. “If he carried out the desires of someone else, then who is it?”
How Mr. Nuzzi, a longtime investigative reporter for publications like Panorama and Il Giornale, both owned by the family of former Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, came to be the go-to guy for Vatican documents is a mystery Mr. Nuzzi is loath to reveal.
Critics say Mr. Nuzzi was a convenient messenger. “He’s a printing press, not an investigative reporter,” Mr. Melloni said.
As the “VatiLeaks” scandal continues, the pope has appeared increasingly isolated, a lonely intellectual unable to rein in his infighting underlings. In his weekly address last Wednesday, Benedict spoke about the leaks scandal for the first time, implicitly defending Cardinal Bertone and Benedict’s personal secretary, Monsignor Georg Gänswein, the recipient of many letters that also appear in Mr. Nuzzi’s book.
“I renew my faith and my encouragement to my closest collaborators and to all those who daily, with loyalty, a spirit of sacrifice and in silence, help me carry out my ministry,” Benedict said.
But not all are working in silence. Back in the hotel lobby, two men came in, one after the other, to ask Mr. Nuzzi to sign copies of his book. “They work for the Vatican,” the author said after the two had left. He pointed to another man who had been sitting on a sofa in the corner of the room, typing on a laptop and then dozing off. “Maybe that guy’s watching who’s been here to see me,” Mr. Nuzzi said mysteriously.
Intrigue filled the air. Mr. Nuzzi smiled. “I have nothing to hide,” he said.
Benedict XVI deplored the turmoil
surrounding the recent publication of leaked Vatican documents today,
but thanked the vast majority of people who work at the Vatican for
their dedication and fidelity.
Speaking at the end of his weekly general audience, the Pope said much of the media coverage of the leak of private letters and of the arrest of his personal assistant has been exaggerated and “completely gratuitous, and has gone far beyond the facts, offering an image of the Holy See that does not correspond to reality”.
Pope Benedict said that while the scandal has saddened him “it has never weakened my firm certainty that, despite human weakness, difficulties and trials, the Church is guided by the Holy Spirit and will never be without the Lord’s help to support it in its journey”. He offered “encouragement to my closest collaborators and all those who, each day with fidelity and a spirit of sacrifice and in silence, help me fulfill my ministry”.
The Pope also offered his prayers for the people of Italy’s Emilia Romagna region after a second earthquake in nine days caused at least 15 deaths and seriously damaged many buildings, including several churches.
“With my prayers and affection, I am close to the injured and those who are suffering difficulties, and I express my deepest sympathy to the families of those who lost their lives,” the Pope said.
The earthquake brought death when roofs, walls and even church bell towers came crashing down. Hundreds were sent to local hospitals and thousands were left homeless. A quake on May 20 had left five people dead and has been blamed for undermining the stability of many of the buildings that fell nine days later.
After the first quake, Pope Benedict sent £80,000 to the region’s dioceses to help them assist victims.
During his main talk during the audience in St Peter’s Square, Pope Benedict continued his series of talks about prayer in the letters of St Paul.
With the help of the Holy Spirit, prayer is a personal encounter with God, the Pope said. It begins with God’s “yes” to the creatures he loves and should end with the believer’s “Amen”, or yes, to God.
God’s love consoles believers in times of tribulation and gives them the strength to console others. Like St Paul, who was “afflicted with every type of tribulation”, each Christian should know that there is never a moment when God turns his back or moves away, the Pope said.
“Dear brothers and sisters, our lives and our journeys often are marked by difficulty, misunderstandings and suffering – we all know this – but through a faithful relationship with God, through constant daily prayer, we can concretely experience the consolation of God. This is a strength of our faith,” he said.
Despite human failings and infidelity, God is always faithful and continually reaches out to each person with love and support, the Pope said. “God’s way of acting – far different from our own – gives us consolation, strength and hope.”
“There is no one who is not reached by God’s faithful love, which is able to reach even those who continue to respond with a ‘no’” and try to turn their backs on God, he said. “God is waiting for us, is always seeking us out, wants to welcome us into communion, forgive us and give us all fullness of life, hope and peace.”
Speaking at the end of his weekly general audience, the Pope said much of the media coverage of the leak of private letters and of the arrest of his personal assistant has been exaggerated and “completely gratuitous, and has gone far beyond the facts, offering an image of the Holy See that does not correspond to reality”.
Pope Benedict said that while the scandal has saddened him “it has never weakened my firm certainty that, despite human weakness, difficulties and trials, the Church is guided by the Holy Spirit and will never be without the Lord’s help to support it in its journey”. He offered “encouragement to my closest collaborators and all those who, each day with fidelity and a spirit of sacrifice and in silence, help me fulfill my ministry”.
The Pope also offered his prayers for the people of Italy’s Emilia Romagna region after a second earthquake in nine days caused at least 15 deaths and seriously damaged many buildings, including several churches.
“With my prayers and affection, I am close to the injured and those who are suffering difficulties, and I express my deepest sympathy to the families of those who lost their lives,” the Pope said.
The earthquake brought death when roofs, walls and even church bell towers came crashing down. Hundreds were sent to local hospitals and thousands were left homeless. A quake on May 20 had left five people dead and has been blamed for undermining the stability of many of the buildings that fell nine days later.
After the first quake, Pope Benedict sent £80,000 to the region’s dioceses to help them assist victims.
During his main talk during the audience in St Peter’s Square, Pope Benedict continued his series of talks about prayer in the letters of St Paul.
With the help of the Holy Spirit, prayer is a personal encounter with God, the Pope said. It begins with God’s “yes” to the creatures he loves and should end with the believer’s “Amen”, or yes, to God.
God’s love consoles believers in times of tribulation and gives them the strength to console others. Like St Paul, who was “afflicted with every type of tribulation”, each Christian should know that there is never a moment when God turns his back or moves away, the Pope said.
“Dear brothers and sisters, our lives and our journeys often are marked by difficulty, misunderstandings and suffering – we all know this – but through a faithful relationship with God, through constant daily prayer, we can concretely experience the consolation of God. This is a strength of our faith,” he said.
Despite human failings and infidelity, God is always faithful and continually reaches out to each person with love and support, the Pope said. “God’s way of acting – far different from our own – gives us consolation, strength and hope.”
“There is no one who is not reached by God’s faithful love, which is able to reach even those who continue to respond with a ‘no’” and try to turn their backs on God, he said. “God is waiting for us, is always seeking us out, wants to welcome us into communion, forgive us and give us all fullness of life, hope and peace.”
6.03.2012
THIS BLOG HAS READERS IN THESE COUNTRIES (verified by Google)
1. Australia,
2. Belarus
3. Belgium,
4. Benin,
5. Brazil,
6. Canada,
7. Chile,
8. China,
9. Colombia,
10. Czech Republic
11. Dominican republic
12. Estonia,
13. France,
14. Gambia
15. Georgia,
16. Germany,
17. Ghana
18. Guyana
19. Hong Kong
20. Hungary
21. Indonesia
22. Ireland,
23. Israel,
24. Italy,
25. Japan,
26. Kenya
27. Kuwait
28. Latvia
29. Lebanon,
30. Lithuania
31. Malaysia
32. Malta,
33. Mauritius
34. Mexico,
35. Namibia
36. Netherlands,
37. New Zealand
38. Nigeria
39. Poland,
40. Romania,
41. Russia,
42. Saudi Arabia,
43. Singapore,
44. Slovakia
45. Slovenia
46. South Africa
47. South Korea
48. Spain,
49. Sweden,
50. Switzerland
51. Taiwan,
52. Thailand,
53. Ukraine,
54. United Arab Emirates,
55. United Kingdom
56. United States,
57. Venezuela,
58. Zambia,
2. Belarus
3. Belgium,
4. Benin,
5. Brazil,
6. Canada,
7. Chile,
8. China,
9. Colombia,
10. Czech Republic
11. Dominican republic
12. Estonia,
13. France,
14. Gambia
15. Georgia,
16. Germany,
17. Ghana
18. Guyana
19. Hong Kong
20. Hungary
21. Indonesia
22. Ireland,
23. Israel,
24. Italy,
25. Japan,
26. Kenya
27. Kuwait
28. Latvia
29. Lebanon,
30. Lithuania
31. Malaysia
32. Malta,
33. Mauritius
34. Mexico,
35. Namibia
36. Netherlands,
37. New Zealand
38. Nigeria
39. Poland,
40. Romania,
41. Russia,
42. Saudi Arabia,
43. Singapore,
44. Slovakia
45. Slovenia
46. South Africa
47. South Korea
48. Spain,
49. Sweden,
50. Switzerland
51. Taiwan,
52. Thailand,
53. Ukraine,
54. United Arab Emirates,
55. United Kingdom
56. United States,
57. Venezuela,
58. Zambia,
6.02.2012
God Bless Us, Everyone (Tiny Tim in Dickens' "A Christmas Carol"))
Last thoughts before Mass for Trinity Sunday, 2012.
Might put this to the people:
Here you are at Mass just like you are most Sundays, but there is a difference this weekend. Today is not only Trinity Sunday, it is also Diamond Jubilee weekend. The nation is on fete celebrating her majesty's 6o years on the throne.
Just suppose I had been holding out on you and that I had arranged for the Queen to join us at the end of Mass and meet us all individually!
How would you feel. Would you wish you were wearing something else? Do you wish I had told you about it earlier?
Most people "dress up" before meeting the Queen or any other important person. We want to look our best.
On Trinity Sunday all baptised people are reminded that in addition to being made in the image and likeness of God, they have also been blessed with his presence in our lives. With that blessing we are fully equipped to meet anyone on earth, high or low. Bearing that blessing we can go out into the world, bearing the livery of God. No need to rush back to our wardrobe, we already have the best possible appearance to meet anyone, anywhere, and bring to them the blessing of the Trinity, the blessing that means life itself.
[Needs a little developing.]
6.01.2012
Who "RUNS" the Church
Those Catholics unhappy with the drift of things in the Church these days, often complain that in spite of the emphasis Vatican 2 put on the place of the world body of Bishop's in running things, the Roman Curia has merely strengthened its controlling grip.
Here's an article from the Chicago Tribune, which may help you think about it. Of course you may already have thought things through and have made your mind up. If so please let this blog know. Here's the article, dated May 31, 2012.
When Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger became Pope Benedict in 2005, epithets like "God's Rottweiler" and "Panzerkardinal" suggested he would bring some German efficiency to the opaque Vatican bureaucracy, the Curia.
Instead, as the "Vatileaks" scandal has revealed, the head of the Roman Catholic Church can't even keep his own private mail secret. His hand-picked deputy, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, faces a "monsignors' mutiny" by prelates in the halls of power.
Benedict's papacy has been marked until now by controversies over things he has said and done, such as his criticism of Islam at Regensburg in 2006 or his 2009 decision to readmit four excommunicated ultra-traditionalist bishops to the Church.
Now a goal he has failed to achieve -- gain control over the Curia -- has come back to haunt him. Leaks of confidential documents on everything from Vatican finances to private papal audiences make his papacy look weak and disorganized.
"We've almost forgotten that reform of the Curia was part of Benedict's program at the start," recalled Isabelle de Gaulmyn, who was Vatican correspondent for the French Catholic daily La Croix at the time.
"Seven years later, the Curia has never seemed as opaque, ineffective, closed and badly governed as it is today."
The "Vatileaks" scandal has revealed, among other issues, the infighting behind the sacking of the Vatican bank president. The pope's own butler has been arrested on suspicion of stealing documents that have since been leaked to the media.
The target seems to be Italian Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, the Vatican secretary of state (prime minister), whose critics accuse him of playing politics and blocking their efforts to stamp out corruption and cronyism in Vatican management.
THROWBACK TO RENAISSANCE MONARCHY
The Curia, a centuries-old bureaucracy dominated by Italian clerics, is essential to the success or failure of a papacy because it can effectively cancel or water down papal decisions if they go against long-standing interests or traditions.
Its name comes from the Latin word for a royal court and its jumble of overlapping departments, commissions and tribunals seems more suited to an intrigue-filled Renaissance monarchy than a modern and transparent democratic government.
The institution that gave the world the word "nepotism" is not always a model meritocracy either. Some officials are talented and dynamic while others are bureaucrats who seem to owe their posts more to connections than capabilities.
Each department has an advisory board of cardinals and bishops and those who sit on several boards can create powerful links that cut across department lines to influence policy.
Pressure for reform grew during the long reign of Pope John Paul. He announced changes in the 1980s to give local bishops more say in central policy-making, but focused more on his travel and preaching and did not really implement it.
Benedict was seen as the best man to reform it since he had been a Curia member since 1981 and reportedly knew it inside out. Now the task looks set to be handed on to his successor.
"I'm not sure anyone has ever really controlled it, or can control it," Thomas F.X. Noble, history professor at Notre Dame University in Indiana, said of the bureaucracy housed on the Vatican grounds and in office buildings nearby.
The Curia has held its own in Church power terms despite two non-Italian popes and the growing majority of Catholics from the developing world.
In February, the last time Benedict named new cardinals, 10 of the 18 who can vote for the next pope were Curia officials. That boosted their faction to 35 percent of the votes in the next conclave, meaning they will play an important role in the election and could try to win the papacy back for Italy.
Supporters of the tradition of Italian popes say only they know the culture well enough to control the Curia.
A SCHOLAR, NOT A SUPERVISOR
The crisis, which hurts Benedict's image as a leader just as he drives an increasingly conservative line in Church policy, is as much a result of the pope's diffident management style as of the institutional dysfunction of the Curia itself."He's a solitary scholar and he's not interested in the bureaucracy," said Chester Gillis, professor of theology at Georgetown University in Washington. "His real ambition seems to be to finish the third volume of his book."
Benedict, a leading Catholic theologian in his own right, has devoted considerable time in office to writing a major study entitled "Jesus of Nazareth" rather than administering the Church. The first two volumes appeared in 2007 and 2011.
His stern reputation stems from his long tenure as head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), where he cracked down on liberal trends such as liberation theology.
But his CDF work focused on his own specialty, theology. "It was not about managing the Church," Gillis noted.
When he was elected pope, Benedict brought along several trusted CDF colleagues, including Bertone.
Bertone's critics call him an autocratic power-broker, a role the Curia lends itself to because its structure suits a Renaissance monarchy more than modern democratic governance.
There are no cabinet meetings among heads of departments, or dicasteries, and information circulates mostly on a need-to-know basis. Decisions with major implications for the Church are not always discussed with other departments that might be affected.
"A TIN EAR PAPACY"
Benedict did start reforming the Curia in early 2006, downgrading its department for interfaith dialogue into a sub-department of the culture ministry and sending its experienced head away to be nuncio (ambassador) in Cairo.
But he restored it as a full department the following year after his Regensburg speech in September 2006, which suggested Islam was violent and irrational, sparked protests by Muslims in several Islamic countries.
Some Curia officials had vetted the speech but not warned him of its diplomatic dangers. At Auschwitz concentration camp in Poland earlier that year, Benedict added the word Holocaust to his speech after journalists saw an advance text and told his aides Jews would be offended if he did not clearly mention it.
Benedict's aides apparently did not prepare him for the wave of sharp protests from Catholics, Jews and even German Chancellor Angela Merkel to his surprise decision in 2009 to readmit four rebel bishops to the Church after a 21-year schism.
The shocked pope had to write a long letter explaining the step and admit nobody in the Curia had done an Internet search for him and seen one bishop was a notorious Holocaust denier.
The Vatican has also reacted slowly and defensively to the clerical sexual abuse scandal shaking national churches around the world, giving the impression it puts its institutional interests ahead of the children molested by priests.
The cumulative effect of such incidents over the years and revelations of Vatican mismanagement now has been to cast Benedict's as "a tin ear papacy," said Christopher Bellitto, a Catholic Church historian at Kean University in New Jersey.
"This all seems to be a power game that matters only to the power players," he said. "It seems to be a Church hierarchy further distancing itself from the people in the pews."
(This story corrects name and university in second to last paragraph)
(Reporting By Tom Heneghan; Editing by Jon Boyle)
Here's an article from the Chicago Tribune, which may help you think about it. Of course you may already have thought things through and have made your mind up. If so please let this blog know. Here's the article, dated May 31, 2012.
When Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger became Pope Benedict in 2005, epithets like "God's Rottweiler" and "Panzerkardinal" suggested he would bring some German efficiency to the opaque Vatican bureaucracy, the Curia.
Instead, as the "Vatileaks" scandal has revealed, the head of the Roman Catholic Church can't even keep his own private mail secret. His hand-picked deputy, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, faces a "monsignors' mutiny" by prelates in the halls of power.
Benedict's papacy has been marked until now by controversies over things he has said and done, such as his criticism of Islam at Regensburg in 2006 or his 2009 decision to readmit four excommunicated ultra-traditionalist bishops to the Church.
Now a goal he has failed to achieve -- gain control over the Curia -- has come back to haunt him. Leaks of confidential documents on everything from Vatican finances to private papal audiences make his papacy look weak and disorganized.
"We've almost forgotten that reform of the Curia was part of Benedict's program at the start," recalled Isabelle de Gaulmyn, who was Vatican correspondent for the French Catholic daily La Croix at the time.
"Seven years later, the Curia has never seemed as opaque, ineffective, closed and badly governed as it is today."
The "Vatileaks" scandal has revealed, among other issues, the infighting behind the sacking of the Vatican bank president. The pope's own butler has been arrested on suspicion of stealing documents that have since been leaked to the media.
The target seems to be Italian Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, the Vatican secretary of state (prime minister), whose critics accuse him of playing politics and blocking their efforts to stamp out corruption and cronyism in Vatican management.
THROWBACK TO RENAISSANCE MONARCHY
The Curia, a centuries-old bureaucracy dominated by Italian clerics, is essential to the success or failure of a papacy because it can effectively cancel or water down papal decisions if they go against long-standing interests or traditions.
Its name comes from the Latin word for a royal court and its jumble of overlapping departments, commissions and tribunals seems more suited to an intrigue-filled Renaissance monarchy than a modern and transparent democratic government.
The institution that gave the world the word "nepotism" is not always a model meritocracy either. Some officials are talented and dynamic while others are bureaucrats who seem to owe their posts more to connections than capabilities.
Each department has an advisory board of cardinals and bishops and those who sit on several boards can create powerful links that cut across department lines to influence policy.
Pressure for reform grew during the long reign of Pope John Paul. He announced changes in the 1980s to give local bishops more say in central policy-making, but focused more on his travel and preaching and did not really implement it.
Benedict was seen as the best man to reform it since he had been a Curia member since 1981 and reportedly knew it inside out. Now the task looks set to be handed on to his successor.
"I'm not sure anyone has ever really controlled it, or can control it," Thomas F.X. Noble, history professor at Notre Dame University in Indiana, said of the bureaucracy housed on the Vatican grounds and in office buildings nearby.
The Curia has held its own in Church power terms despite two non-Italian popes and the growing majority of Catholics from the developing world.
In February, the last time Benedict named new cardinals, 10 of the 18 who can vote for the next pope were Curia officials. That boosted their faction to 35 percent of the votes in the next conclave, meaning they will play an important role in the election and could try to win the papacy back for Italy.
Supporters of the tradition of Italian popes say only they know the culture well enough to control the Curia.
A SCHOLAR, NOT A SUPERVISOR
The crisis, which hurts Benedict's image as a leader just as he drives an increasingly conservative line in Church policy, is as much a result of the pope's diffident management style as of the institutional dysfunction of the Curia itself."He's a solitary scholar and he's not interested in the bureaucracy," said Chester Gillis, professor of theology at Georgetown University in Washington. "His real ambition seems to be to finish the third volume of his book."
Benedict, a leading Catholic theologian in his own right, has devoted considerable time in office to writing a major study entitled "Jesus of Nazareth" rather than administering the Church. The first two volumes appeared in 2007 and 2011.
His stern reputation stems from his long tenure as head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), where he cracked down on liberal trends such as liberation theology.
But his CDF work focused on his own specialty, theology. "It was not about managing the Church," Gillis noted.
When he was elected pope, Benedict brought along several trusted CDF colleagues, including Bertone.
Bertone's critics call him an autocratic power-broker, a role the Curia lends itself to because its structure suits a Renaissance monarchy more than modern democratic governance.
There are no cabinet meetings among heads of departments, or dicasteries, and information circulates mostly on a need-to-know basis. Decisions with major implications for the Church are not always discussed with other departments that might be affected.
"A TIN EAR PAPACY"
Benedict did start reforming the Curia in early 2006, downgrading its department for interfaith dialogue into a sub-department of the culture ministry and sending its experienced head away to be nuncio (ambassador) in Cairo.
But he restored it as a full department the following year after his Regensburg speech in September 2006, which suggested Islam was violent and irrational, sparked protests by Muslims in several Islamic countries.
Some Curia officials had vetted the speech but not warned him of its diplomatic dangers. At Auschwitz concentration camp in Poland earlier that year, Benedict added the word Holocaust to his speech after journalists saw an advance text and told his aides Jews would be offended if he did not clearly mention it.
Benedict's aides apparently did not prepare him for the wave of sharp protests from Catholics, Jews and even German Chancellor Angela Merkel to his surprise decision in 2009 to readmit four rebel bishops to the Church after a 21-year schism.
The shocked pope had to write a long letter explaining the step and admit nobody in the Curia had done an Internet search for him and seen one bishop was a notorious Holocaust denier.
The Vatican has also reacted slowly and defensively to the clerical sexual abuse scandal shaking national churches around the world, giving the impression it puts its institutional interests ahead of the children molested by priests.
The cumulative effect of such incidents over the years and revelations of Vatican mismanagement now has been to cast Benedict's as "a tin ear papacy," said Christopher Bellitto, a Catholic Church historian at Kean University in New Jersey.
"This all seems to be a power game that matters only to the power players," he said. "It seems to be a Church hierarchy further distancing itself from the people in the pews."
(This story corrects name and university in second to last paragraph)
(Reporting By Tom Heneghan; Editing by Jon Boyle)
5.31.2012
TRINITY: A COMPASS BEARING FOR LIFE
GLIMPSES OF THE TRINITY IN THE LIVES OF THOSE MADE IN GOD'S IMAGE
Attraction, Longing, Desire,
Ownership, Power, Influence, Control;
Fickle and misleading signposts on all our journeys.
They read like place names on the tortured map
of the human heart.
And not just the web-like story of individual human beings;
the political map of the world,
the roll call of Statesmen, Churchmen, Businessmen,
Educators, Writers and Artists,
bears equal testimony
to the ideals, the ambitions, the plans and hopes,
the schemes and machinations
that are the route map of history.
With wonderful directness,
the first page of The Bible tells us:
"In the image of God He made Him, Male and female he created them."
Placed against that statement of belief
All our twisted motivations lie revealed.
The pain is like a crucifixion.
Today, Trinity Sunday,
We do our daily blessing of ourselves,
With care, and awed awareness.
To bless is to dress,
To go out into the day, wearing the livery of God.
Invoking the Blessing of the Trinity on our lives,
We present ourselves as we would have people
see us
and bring to them the blessing we enjoy.
We do not worry that words fail us on this day
for the Trinity is not a riddle to be solved
but a mystery to be explored,
not an arrangement of characters,
but a relationship of persons,
a relationship of love;
free, yet interdependent, life-giving, love.
We know this by the sign we drew
while invoking the Trinity
It was the sign of all that we had to offer Him
that empty token of all our failures,
the Cross.
God took it as the token of His self-expression,
A compass-bearing for LIFE,
His Word is all.
©Image & Words,Valentine Farrell 03-05-2007
5.28.2012
POLES APART
There's the North Pole and there's the South Pole. They top and tail our little planet as it whizzes about on its allotted route among the stars.
Then there's the Positive Pole and the Negative Pole which energise our batteries. I am pleased that you know all about such things for it spares me the embarrassment of displaying my ignorance.
But there are other Poles, not so easily spoken about and yet real enough to our imaginations as we struggle to picture the creative tensions that shape our particular lives. [ Yes, I know, not always creative in a happy sense]
Put simply these are those opposites between which we live out our lives. They can be easily pictured by recalling such obvious tensions as Fear, Courage, Love, Retreat. Such opposites may unrest us at times, give us sleepless nights and so on, and yet without such poles to our existence and the tension they necessarily create, it is very doubtful if we would ever amount to anything much.
But enough, I will no more. I mention these things here only to draw attention (yet again) to the Gospels of the first two Sundays of Lent: Temptations and Transfiguration. These are never out of season for those who honestly devote themselves to really hearing the Gospel.
We would do well not to wax too "religious" in thinking about what the Gospels have to say. We would be better served in bringing to our study of the scriptures an honest admission of the secular core to our everyday existence
The laziness that comes from familiarity with the Gospel texts, often traps us into merely looking for the religious and the pious somewhere there among the jumble of words. We need not do so, indeed we should not do so.
Neither we, nor anyone else, live our lives in a purely religious world, but in a real, live, secular world. Nor should we fear to use such language; it is no betrayal of faith to be honest about things. Indeed, we are more faithful to the God-sent Wisdom of the Second Vatican Council by endeavouring to walk in communion with secular thinkers. If we can rouse ourselves to make the effort of hearing the Gospels in this context rather than in the colourful, make-believe world of the merely pious, we will get the surprise of our lives.
People in the pews I urge you, settle for no less. Comfort yourselves with the trite and the cosy, continue happily telling yourself that "thinking" is no part of your calling, but that to obey your bosses is everything; live like that and the most potentially creative poles in your life will remain idle forever.And,sadly, yours will be the story of someone who might have been.
Then there's the Positive Pole and the Negative Pole which energise our batteries. I am pleased that you know all about such things for it spares me the embarrassment of displaying my ignorance.
But there are other Poles, not so easily spoken about and yet real enough to our imaginations as we struggle to picture the creative tensions that shape our particular lives. [ Yes, I know, not always creative in a happy sense]
Put simply these are those opposites between which we live out our lives. They can be easily pictured by recalling such obvious tensions as Fear, Courage, Love, Retreat. Such opposites may unrest us at times, give us sleepless nights and so on, and yet without such poles to our existence and the tension they necessarily create, it is very doubtful if we would ever amount to anything much.
But enough, I will no more. I mention these things here only to draw attention (yet again) to the Gospels of the first two Sundays of Lent: Temptations and Transfiguration. These are never out of season for those who honestly devote themselves to really hearing the Gospel.
We would do well not to wax too "religious" in thinking about what the Gospels have to say. We would be better served in bringing to our study of the scriptures an honest admission of the secular core to our everyday existence
The laziness that comes from familiarity with the Gospel texts, often traps us into merely looking for the religious and the pious somewhere there among the jumble of words. We need not do so, indeed we should not do so.
Neither we, nor anyone else, live our lives in a purely religious world, but in a real, live, secular world. Nor should we fear to use such language; it is no betrayal of faith to be honest about things. Indeed, we are more faithful to the God-sent Wisdom of the Second Vatican Council by endeavouring to walk in communion with secular thinkers. If we can rouse ourselves to make the effort of hearing the Gospels in this context rather than in the colourful, make-believe world of the merely pious, we will get the surprise of our lives.
People in the pews I urge you, settle for no less. Comfort yourselves with the trite and the cosy, continue happily telling yourself that "thinking" is no part of your calling, but that to obey your bosses is everything; live like that and the most potentially creative poles in your life will remain idle forever.And,sadly, yours will be the story of someone who might have been.
The picture above
occupies an entire wall in the Australian National Art gallery in Canberra.
Next time you're out that way do go and see it.
In spite of what you may think of it here,
the real thing will astound you.
Like the Gospels, I suppose.
occupies an entire wall in the Australian National Art gallery in Canberra.
Next time you're out that way do go and see it.
In spite of what you may think of it here,
the real thing will astound you.
Like the Gospels, I suppose.




